dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
An appreciation-lean market without the demand pressure to back it. The rent math runs thin.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already −0.7% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, +19.2% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 0.7% YoY while the median home got up 2.3% bigger, so value per square foot is down 5.3%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $799K purchase rents for $2,045/mo: 0.26% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: 7 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 8 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 35 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 4 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 98103 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 55.6% of this ZIP's 26,873 occupied households, on a median household income of $131K.
| Measure | ZIP 98103 | King County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $131K | $125K | +$6K |
| Below Poverty Level | 6.8% | 8.6% | -1.8% |
| Median Age | 34.50 | 37.40 | -2.90 |
| Total Population | 52,671 | 2,287,171 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 1.94 | 2.39 | -0.45 |
| Owner-Occupied | 44.4% | 55.4% | -11.0% |
| Worked From Home | 37.9% | 29.2% | +8.7% |
| Mean Commute | 25.30 | 27.60 | -2.30 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.1% to 2,287,171: residents under 18 are down 0.3% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $125K, 8.6% of residents are below the poverty level, 29.2% work from home.