dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −1.0% YoY. inventory, +10.3% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 1.0% YoY while the median home got up 8.4% bigger, so value per square foot is down 5.5%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95841 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 65.3% of this ZIP's 8,232 occupied households, on a median household income of $61K.
| Measure | ZIP 95841 | Sacramento County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $61K | $92K | -$31K |
| Below Poverty Level | 16.4% | 12.5% | +3.9% |
| Median Age | 35.20 | 37.50 | -2.30 |
| Total Population | 20,500 | 1,594,006 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.45 | 2.75 | -0.30 |
| Owner-Occupied | 34.7% | 59.0% | -24.3% |
| Worked From Home | 16.7% | 19.1% | -2.4% |
| Mean Commute | 26.90 | 27.30 | -0.40 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.6% to 1,594,006: residents under 18 are down 0.3% and those 65 and over are up 2.9%.
County median household income is $92K, 12.5% of residents are below the poverty level, 19.1% work from home.