dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is +20.1% YoY. inventory, +72.4% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 20.1% YoY while the median home got up 43.3% bigger, so value per square foot is down 8.7%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95832 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 38.2% of this ZIP's 3,280 occupied households, on a median household income of $82K.
| Measure | ZIP 95832 | Sacramento County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $82K | $92K | -$10K |
| Below Poverty Level | 13.5% | 12.5% | +1.0% |
| Median Age | 33.10 | 37.50 | -4.40 |
| Total Population | 12,850 | 1,594,006 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 3.86 | 2.75 | +1.11 |
| Owner-Occupied | 61.8% | 59.0% | +2.8% |
| Worked From Home | 12.0% | 19.1% | -7.1% |
| Mean Commute | 32.10 | 27.30 | +4.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.6% to 1,594,006: residents under 18 are down 0.3% and those 65 and over are up 2.9%.
County median household income is $92K, 12.5% of residents are below the poverty level, 19.1% work from home.