dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −2.4% YoY. inventory, +5.9% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 2.4% YoY while the median home got down 0.1% bigger, so value per square foot is up 0.4%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95815 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 60.2% of this ZIP's 9,668 occupied households, on a median household income of $60K.
| Measure | ZIP 95815 | Sacramento County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $60K | $92K | -$32K |
| Below Poverty Level | 21.6% | 12.5% | +9.1% |
| Median Age | 33.70 | 37.50 | -3.80 |
| Total Population | 26,658 | 1,594,006 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.72 | 2.75 | -0.03 |
| Owner-Occupied | 39.8% | 59.0% | -19.2% |
| Worked From Home | 11.0% | 19.1% | -8.1% |
| Mean Commute | 24.60 | 27.30 | -2.70 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.6% to 1,594,006: residents under 18 are down 0.3% and those 65 and over are up 2.9%.
County median household income is $92K, 12.5% of residents are below the poverty level, 19.1% work from home.