dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −4.6% YoY. inventory, +2.5% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 4.6% YoY while the median home got down 2.3% bigger, so value per square foot is up 2.4%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95765 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 30.4% of this ZIP's 14,882 occupied households, on a median household income of $138K.
| Measure | ZIP 95765 | Placer County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $138K | $116K | +$22K |
| Below Poverty Level | 3.3% | 6.8% | -3.5% |
| Median Age | 38.40 | 42.50 | -4.10 |
| Total Population | 43,871 | 419,156 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.90 | 2.62 | +0.28 |
| Owner-Occupied | 69.6% | 74.8% | -5.1% |
| Worked From Home | 26.2% | 22.7% | +3.5% |
| Mean Commute | 27.40 | 27.40 | 0.00 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.6% to 419,156: residents under 18 are up 0.7% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $116K, 6.8% of residents are below the poverty level, 22.7% work from home.