dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply, appreciation-lean market. The rent math runs thin; demand and tenant incomes are the story.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already −3.1% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, −15.6% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 3.1% YoY while the median home got up 0.1% bigger, so value per square foot is up 1.2%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $522K purchase rents for $2,323/mo: 0.44% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: Studio (rent only, no matching sale price), 5 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 6 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 28 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 4 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented), Manufactured (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95678 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 44.9% of this ZIP's 18,028 occupied households, on a median household income of $101K.
| Measure | ZIP 95678 | Placer County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $101K | $116K | -$15K |
| Below Poverty Level | 7.7% | 6.8% | +0.9% |
| Median Age | 38.20 | 42.50 | -4.30 |
| Total Population | 45,346 | 419,156 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.49 | 2.62 | -0.13 |
| Owner-Occupied | 55.1% | 74.8% | -19.6% |
| Worked From Home | 20.2% | 22.7% | -2.5% |
| Mean Commute | 23.80 | 27.40 | -3.60 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.6% to 419,156: residents under 18 are up 0.7% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $116K, 6.8% of residents are below the poverty level, 22.7% work from home.