dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply, appreciation-lean market. The rent math runs thin; demand and tenant incomes are the story.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already −12.7% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, −11.6% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 12.7% YoY while the median home got down 13.0% bigger, so value per square foot is up 2.4%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $679K purchase rents for $2,312/mo: 0.34% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Sales here take about 21 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 2 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Manufactured (sold here, not rented), Multi-Family (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95661 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 37.3% of this ZIP's 13,193 occupied households, on a median household income of $106K.
| Measure | ZIP 95661 | Placer County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $106K | $116K | -$10K |
| Below Poverty Level | 7.4% | 6.8% | +0.6% |
| Median Age | 43.50 | 42.50 | +1.00 |
| Total Population | 32,589 | 419,156 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.40 | 2.62 | -0.22 |
| Owner-Occupied | 62.7% | 74.8% | -12.0% |
| Worked From Home | 23.6% | 22.7% | +0.9% |
| Mean Commute | 23.60 | 27.40 | -3.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.6% to 419,156: residents under 18 are up 0.7% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $116K, 6.8% of residents are below the poverty level, 22.7% work from home.