dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −16.7% YoY. inventory, +2.7% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 16.7% YoY while the median home got down 11.0% bigger, so value per square foot is down 5.3%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95133 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 44.6% of this ZIP's 9,309 occupied households, on a median household income of $142K.
| Measure | ZIP 95133 | Santa Clara County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $142K | $164K | -$22K |
| Below Poverty Level | 9.5% | 7.1% | +2.4% |
| Median Age | 38.10 | 38.10 | 0.00 |
| Total Population | 29,710 | 1,902,047 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 3.15 | 2.82 | +0.33 |
| Owner-Occupied | 55.4% | 55.1% | +0.4% |
| Worked From Home | 19.1% | 23.9% | -4.8% |
| Mean Commute | 26.20 | 26.20 | 0.00 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.1% to 1,902,047: residents under 18 are down 2.2% and those 65 and over are up 3.0%.
County median household income is $164K, 7.1% of residents are below the poverty level, 23.9% work from home.