dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is +69.5% YoY. inventory, +56.3% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 69.5% YoY while the median home got up 23.0% bigger, so value per square foot is up 1.7%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 95129 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 41.4% of this ZIP's 14,105 occupied households, on a median household income of $196K.
| Measure | ZIP 95129 | Santa Clara County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $196K | $164K | +$31K |
| Below Poverty Level | 4.3% | 7.1% | -2.8% |
| Median Age | 40.90 | 38.10 | +2.80 |
| Total Population | 41,321 | 1,902,047 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.91 | 2.82 | +0.09 |
| Owner-Occupied | 58.6% | 55.1% | +3.5% |
| Worked From Home | 26.6% | 23.9% | +2.7% |
| Mean Commute | 26.10 | 26.20 | -0.10 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.1% to 1,902,047: residents under 18 are down 2.2% and those 65 and over are up 3.0%.
County median household income is $164K, 7.1% of residents are below the poverty level, 23.9% work from home.