Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −9.8% YoY. inventory, −19.4% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 9.8% YoY while the median home got down 8.2% bigger, so value per square foot is up 1.9%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 90505 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 44.2% of this ZIP's 13,776 occupied households, on a median household income of $116K.
| Measure | ZIP 90505 | Los Angeles County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $116K | $90K | +$25K |
| Below Poverty Level | 6.7% | 13.7% | -7.0% |
| Median Age | 44.40 | 38.20 | +6.20 |
| Total Population | 35,148 | 9,808,667 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.53 | 2.81 | -0.28 |
| Owner-Occupied | 55.8% | 45.9% | +9.9% |
| Worked From Home | 24.0% | 17.1% | +6.9% |
| Mean Commute | 28.70 | 30.40 | -1.70 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.4% to 9,808,667: residents under 18 are down 1.9% and those 65 and over are up 2.7%.
County median household income is $90K, 13.7% of residents are below the poverty level, 17.1% work from home.