Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −7.3% YoY. inventory, +35.2% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 7.3% YoY while the median home got down 10.0% bigger, so value per square foot is up 0.9%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 90501 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 56.4% of this ZIP's 14,870 occupied households, on a median household income of $93K.
| Measure | ZIP 90501 | Los Angeles County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $93K | $90K | +$3K |
| Below Poverty Level | 12.3% | 13.7% | -1.4% |
| Median Age | 38.70 | 38.20 | +0.50 |
| Total Population | 41,787 | 9,808,667 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.78 | 2.81 | -0.03 |
| Owner-Occupied | 43.6% | 45.9% | -2.3% |
| Worked From Home | 13.8% | 17.1% | -3.3% |
| Mean Commute | 25.10 | 30.40 | -5.30 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.4% to 9,808,667: residents under 18 are down 1.9% and those 65 and over are up 2.7%.
County median household income is $90K, 13.7% of residents are below the poverty level, 17.1% work from home.