dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply, appreciation-lean market. The rent math runs thin; demand and tenant incomes are the story.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already +5.4% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, +20.0% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 5.4% YoY while the median home got up 4.1% bigger, so value per square foot is down 0.3%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $2.96M purchase rents for $3,938/mo: 0.13% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: 6 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 7 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 8 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 10 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 3 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented), Multi-Family (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 90291 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 67.1% of this ZIP's 14,337 occupied households, on a median household income of $123K.
| Measure | ZIP 90291 | Los Angeles County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $123K | $90K | +$33K |
| Below Poverty Level | 11.5% | 13.7% | -2.2% |
| Median Age | 40.00 | 38.20 | +1.80 |
| Total Population | 26,324 | 9,808,667 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 1.81 | 2.81 | -1.00 |
| Owner-Occupied | 32.9% | 45.9% | -13.0% |
| Worked From Home | 44.7% | 17.1% | +27.6% |
| Mean Commute | 25.50 | 30.40 | -4.90 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.4% to 9,808,667: residents under 18 are down 1.9% and those 65 and over are up 2.7%.
County median household income is $90K, 13.7% of residents are below the poverty level, 17.1% work from home.