dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
An appreciation-lean market without the demand pressure to back it. The rent math runs thin.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already −25.9% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, −32.5% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 25.9% YoY while the median home got down 11.0% bigger, so value per square foot is down 6.8%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $1.90M purchase rents for $6,000/mo: 0.32% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: 4 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 8 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 2 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Single Family (rented here, not sold).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 90067 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 34.6% of this ZIP's 2,266 occupied households, on a median household income of $195K.
| Measure | ZIP 90067 | Los Angeles County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $195K | $90K | +$105K |
| Below Poverty Level | 8.7% | 13.7% | -5.0% |
| Median Age | 59.50 | 38.20 | +21.30 |
| Total Population | 3,875 | 9,808,667 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 1.71 | 2.81 | -1.10 |
| Owner-Occupied | 65.4% | 45.9% | +19.5% |
| Worked From Home | 26.1% | 17.1% | +9.0% |
| Mean Commute | 25.60 | 30.40 | -4.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is down 0.4% to 9,808,667: residents under 18 are down 1.9% and those 65 and over are up 2.7%.
County median household income is $90K, 13.7% of residents are below the poverty level, 17.1% work from home.