dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is +1.0% YoY. inventory, −4.2% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 1.0% YoY while the median home got down 7.1% bigger, so value per square foot is up 0.9%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 89703 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 27.5% of this ZIP's 4,801 occupied households, on a median household income of $85K.
| Measure | ZIP 89703 | Carson City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $85K | $72K | +$13K |
| Below Poverty Level | 6.7% | 10.3% | -3.6% |
| Median Age | 52.80 | 42.40 | +10.40 |
| Total Population | 10,738 | 58,384 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.17 | 2.34 | -0.17 |
| Owner-Occupied | 72.5% | 62.3% | +10.2% |
| Worked From Home | 9.6% | 9.8% | -0.2% |
| Mean Commute | 20.80 | 20.50 | +0.30 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.0% to 58,384: residents under 18 are down 1.2% and those 65 and over are up 2.1%.
County median household income is $72K, 10.3% of residents are below the poverty level, 9.8% work from home.