dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A market with no active rental pool to price against. The sale-side figures below are the whole picture.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −3.4% YoY. inventory, −6.0% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 3.4% YoY while the median home got down 0.1% bigger, so value per square foot is down 5.7%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 85749 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 14.5% of this ZIP's 7,853 occupied households, on a median household income of $109K.
| Measure | ZIP 85749 | Pima County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $109K | $70K | +$39K |
| Below Poverty Level | 3.7% | 14.3% | -10.6% |
| Median Age | 54.50 | 39.80 | +14.70 |
| Total Population | 18,843 | 1,060,490 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.38 | 2.36 | +0.02 |
| Owner-Occupied | 85.5% | 65.2% | +20.3% |
| Worked From Home | 21.7% | 15.4% | +6.3% |
| Mean Commute | 27.10 | 24.30 | +2.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.0% to 1,060,490: residents under 18 are down 0.4% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $70K, 14.3% of residents are below the poverty level, 15.4% work from home.