dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A market with no active rental pool to price against. The sale-side figures below are the whole picture.
What would change this read: the median listing price is +2.2% YoY. inventory, −36.7% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 2.2% YoY while the median home got up 25.1% bigger, so value per square foot is down 1.2%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 85735 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 11.6% of this ZIP's 4,058 occupied households, on a median household income of $74K.
| Measure | ZIP 85735 | Pima County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $74K | $70K | +$4K |
| Below Poverty Level | 8.7% | 14.3% | -5.6% |
| Median Age | 44.20 | 39.80 | +4.40 |
| Total Population | 10,718 | 1,060,490 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.64 | 2.36 | +0.28 |
| Owner-Occupied | 88.4% | 65.2% | +23.2% |
| Worked From Home | 13.8% | 15.4% | -1.6% |
| Mean Commute | 36.90 | 24.30 | +12.60 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.0% to 1,060,490: residents under 18 are down 0.4% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $70K, 14.3% of residents are below the poverty level, 15.4% work from home.