dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A market with no active rental pool to price against. The sale-side figures below are the whole picture.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −11.4% YoY. inventory, +0.0% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 11.4% YoY while the median home got down 6.8% bigger, so value per square foot is down 4.4%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 85705 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 55.1% of this ZIP's 25,734 occupied households, on a median household income of $37K.
| Measure | ZIP 85705 | Pima County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $37K | $70K | -$33K |
| Below Poverty Level | 29.2% | 14.3% | +14.9% |
| Median Age | 33.90 | 39.80 | -5.90 |
| Total Population | 54,700 | 1,060,490 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.10 | 2.36 | -0.26 |
| Owner-Occupied | 44.9% | 65.2% | -20.3% |
| Worked From Home | 9.2% | 15.4% | -6.2% |
| Mean Commute | 21.40 | 24.30 | -2.90 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.0% to 1,060,490: residents under 18 are down 0.4% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $70K, 14.3% of residents are below the poverty level, 15.4% work from home.