dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
An appreciation-lean market without the demand pressure to back it. The rent math runs thin.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already +5.8% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, +56.3% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 5.8% YoY while the median home got up 10.6% bigger, so value per square foot is down 19.5%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $520K purchase rents for $1,395/mo: 0.27% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: 4 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 5 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 6 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 74 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 3 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented), Multi-Family (no rental days-on-market reported).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 85701 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 74.1% of this ZIP's 3,411 occupied households, on a median household income of $52K.
| Measure | ZIP 85701 | Pima County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $52K | $70K | -$19K |
| Below Poverty Level | 25.4% | 14.3% | +11.1% |
| Median Age | 37.00 | 39.80 | -2.80 |
| Total Population | 5,498 | 1,060,490 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 1.60 | 2.36 | -0.76 |
| Owner-Occupied | 25.9% | 65.2% | -39.4% |
| Worked From Home | 31.6% | 15.4% | +16.2% |
| Mean Commute | 23.80 | 24.30 | -0.50 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.0% to 1,060,490: residents under 18 are down 0.4% and those 65 and over are up 3.1%.
County median household income is $70K, 14.3% of residents are below the poverty level, 15.4% work from home.