dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is +7.8% YoY. inventory, +7.5% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 7.8% YoY while the median home got up 1.6% bigger, so value per square foot is down 2.1%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 84057 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 37.0% of this ZIP's 11,800 occupied households, on a median household income of $83K.
| Measure | ZIP 84057 | Utah County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $83K | $101K | -$18K |
| Below Poverty Level | 9.0% | 8.7% | +0.3% |
| Median Age | 28.40 | 25.80 | +2.60 |
| Total Population | 36,881 | 705,400 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 3.09 | 3.39 | -0.30 |
| Owner-Occupied | 63.0% | 68.3% | -5.3% |
| Worked From Home | 15.3% | 19.0% | -3.7% |
| Mean Commute | 20.80 | 22.60 | -1.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 3.2% to 705,400: residents under 18 are up 1.4% and those 65 and over are up 4.6%.
County median household income is $101K, 8.7% of residents are below the poverty level, 19.0% work from home.