dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A market with no active rental pool to price against. The sale-side figures below are the whole picture.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −0.1% YoY. inventory, +2.5% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 0.1% YoY while the median home got up 8.3% bigger, so value per square foot is up 2.4%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 81623 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 30.6% of this ZIP's 6,362 occupied households, on a median household income of $110K.
| Measure | ZIP 81623 | Garfield County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $110K | $91K | +$19K |
| Below Poverty Level | 7.5% | 8.2% | -0.7% |
| Median Age | 44.60 | 37.60 | +7.00 |
| Total Population | 15,067 | 62,479 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.34 | 2.62 | -0.28 |
| Owner-Occupied | 69.4% | 69.6% | -0.2% |
| Worked From Home | 15.8% | 11.0% | +4.8% |
| Mean Commute | 28.60 | 31.40 | -2.80 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.7% to 62,479: residents under 18 are down 0.8% and those 65 and over are up 4.5%.
County median household income is $91K, 8.2% of residents are below the poverty level, 11.0% work from home.