Compare with
A cash-flow-lean market. Rents carry the return here rather than price growth.
What would change this read: price growth (median −0.3% YoY) outrunning rents would pull rent-to-price back under 0.8%/mo and weaken the cash-flow case. inventory, +100.0% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 0.3% YoY while the median home got up 10.5% bigger, so value per square foot is down 9.8%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $289K purchase rents for $2,400/mo: 0.83% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 78742 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 42.5% of this ZIP's 365 occupied households, on a median household income of $74K.
| Measure | ZIP 78742 | Travis County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | -- | $100K | -- |
| Below Poverty Level | 30.8% | 10.9% | +19.9% |
| Median Age | 44.70 | 35.60 | +9.10 |
| Total Population | 847 | 1,330,015 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.32 | 2.23 | +0.09 |
| Owner-Occupied | 57.5% | 52.1% | +5.4% |
| Worked From Home | 0.0% | 30.2% | -30.2% |
| Mean Commute | 29.80 | 25.20 | +4.60 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.7% to 1,330,015: residents under 18 are up 0.2% and those 65 and over are up 4.6%.
County median household income is $100K, 10.9% of residents are below the poverty level, 30.2% work from home.