dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
An appreciation-lean market without the demand pressure to back it. The rent math runs thin.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already +15.3% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, −6.9% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 15.3% YoY while the median home got up 9.6% bigger, so value per square foot is up 6.4%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
At the median, a $308K purchase rents for $1,595/mo: 0.52% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Not shown: 5 BR (sale only, no matching rent), 6 BR (sale only, no matching rent).
Sales here take about 33 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 2 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Condo (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented), Manufactured (sold here, not rented), Multi-Family (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 67210 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 59.0% of this ZIP's 3,023 occupied households, on a median household income of $59K.
| Measure | ZIP 67210 | Sedgwick County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $59K | $69K | -$10K |
| Below Poverty Level | 29.8% | 13.9% | +15.9% |
| Median Age | 28.20 | 36.00 | -7.80 |
| Total Population | 9,024 | 528,226 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.98 | 2.51 | +0.47 |
| Owner-Occupied | 41.0% | 63.1% | -22.1% |
| Worked From Home | 6.3% | 8.1% | -1.8% |
| Mean Commute | 20.40 | 19.30 | +1.10 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.7% to 528,226: residents under 18 are down 0.4% and those 65 and over are up 3.3%.
County median household income is $69K, 13.9% of residents are below the poverty level, 8.1% work from home.