dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply, appreciation-lean market. The rent math runs thin; demand and tenant incomes are the story.
What would change this read: a price correction (median already +0.5% YoY) or rent growth lifting rent-to-price toward 0.8%/mo would move this ZIP toward a cash-flow story. inventory, +5.5% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is up 0.5% YoY while the median home got down 0.4% bigger, so value per square foot is up 0.0%.
Min/max come from the active-listing pool; the median comes from Realtor's separate listing set — the two are not subsets of each other, so the median's position relative to the tiles above should not be read literally.
Not shown: 8 BR (no price per sq ft reported).
At the median, a $550K purchase rents for $1,875/mo: 0.34% of price per month against the 1% rule's 1.00%.
Sales here take about 31 days longer to go under contract than rentals (median across 4 property types).
Not shown: Apartment (rented here, not sold), Land (sold here, not rented).
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 48104 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 63.1% of this ZIP's 17,526 occupied households, on a median household income of $64K.
| Measure | ZIP 48104 | Washtenaw County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $64K | $89K | -$25K |
| Below Poverty Level | 36.3% | 14.2% | +22.1% |
| Median Age | 22.90 | 35.00 | -12.10 |
| Total Population | 43,979 | 369,822 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.34 | 2.33 | +0.01 |
| Owner-Occupied | 36.9% | 61.6% | -24.7% |
| Worked From Home | 27.2% | 22.6% | +4.6% |
| Mean Commute | 18.80 | 23.50 | -4.70 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 0.4% to 369,822: residents under 18 are down 0.3% and those 65 and over are up 3.6%.
County median household income is $89K, 14.2% of residents are below the poverty level, 22.6% work from home.