Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −3.2% YoY. inventory, +5.8% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 3.2% YoY while the median home got down 15.4% bigger, so value per square foot is up 8.8%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 20176 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 21.7% of this ZIP's 16,720 occupied households, on a median household income of $168K.
| Measure | ZIP 20176 | Loudoun County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $168K | $182K | -$13K |
| Below Poverty Level | 5.8% | 4.2% | +1.6% |
| Median Age | 38.70 | 38.20 | +0.50 |
| Total Population | 51,471 | 432,998 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 3.06 | 3.02 | +0.04 |
| Owner-Occupied | 78.3% | 77.9% | +0.4% |
| Worked From Home | 27.3% | 31.2% | -3.9% |
| Mean Commute | 28.40 | 30.10 | -1.70 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.4% to 432,998: residents under 18 are down 0.5% and those 65 and over are up 5.9%.
County median household income is $182K, 4.2% of residents are below the poverty level, 31.2% work from home.