dynamic.RE
dynamic.RELoading market data
Compare with
A tight-supply market with no rental pool to price against. Demand is visible here; the rent math is not.
What would change this read: the median listing price is −3.0% YoY. inventory, −5.7% YoY, is the number to watch.
The median listing price is down 3.0% YoY while the median home got up 2.5% bigger, so value per square foot is down 5.0%.
U.S. Census ACS characteristics for ZIP 20175 itself, not its parent county.
Renters hold 25.2% of this ZIP's 12,240 occupied households, on a median household income of $175K.
| Measure | ZIP 20175 | Loudoun County | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $175K | $182K | -$7K |
| Below Poverty Level | 4.3% | 4.2% | +0.1% |
| Median Age | 38.10 | 38.20 | -0.10 |
| Total Population | 34,733 | 432,998 | -- |
| Avg Household Size | 2.82 | 3.02 | -0.20 |
| Owner-Occupied | 74.8% | 77.9% | -3.1% |
| Worked From Home | 33.3% | 31.2% | +2.1% |
| Mean Commute | 26.90 | 30.10 | -3.20 |
Higher or lower is not itself good or bad — it describes the neighborhood, not the investment.
ZIP-level figures come from ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, which approximate but do not exactly match USPS ZIP codes. A missing value is suppressed or unavailable at this sample size, not zero. Estimates for 2019–2020 use the 2010 ZCTA boundaries and 2021–2024 the 2020 ones, so a step between those two years may be a boundary change rather than real movement.
County population is up 1.4% to 432,998: residents under 18 are down 0.5% and those 65 and over are up 5.9%.
County median household income is $182K, 4.2% of residents are below the poverty level, 31.2% work from home.